Advertisement
Shakespeare on Film: Antony and Cleopatra
In MM's sixth week of Shakespeare on film, we examine why Charlton Heston's Antony and Cleopatra didn't fare too well.
Antony and Cleopatra (1972)
d. Charlton Heston
After playing Marc Antony in the 1950 and 1970 Julius Caesars, Charlton Heston had become obsessed with adapting Antony and Cleopatra, which he considered Shakespeare’s finest work, but which had never previously been filmed at feature length. His love affair with character and play reached a rocky conclusion in this overlong epic.
After writing a screenplay that removes several of Antony’s and Octavius’s friends and officers at negligible cost, he assumed directing duties only after being turned down by Orson Welles, who would surely no have allowed Shakespeare’s inherently cinematic plot to crisscross between Alexandria, Rome, Syria and Athens as sluggishly as Heston; nor, one suspects, would Welles have introduced so much spurious background action, such as the gory bout between two gladiators, which distracts from what should be a riveting meeting between Antony and Octavius, from Act II, Scene ii.
For the battle of Actium, a naval clash Shakespeare could only allude to via “noise of a sea-fight,” Heston craved massive spectacle; he could only afford original footage of Antony’s flagship ramming one of Octavius’s galleys, embellished with outtakes from Ben-Hur (1959). The resulting close-ups of two vast, sturdy replicas, intercut with long shots of tiny, flimsy models are laughable, ruining the pivotal moment when Cleopatra betrays Antony. The later battle, at which Octavius’s cavalry overwhelms Antony’s infantry, is more effective, though Heston cannot resist over-indulging his own heroic image as Antony hacks his way through Roman horsemen with super-human strength.
Lousy reviews scuppered the movie’s chances of wide distribution in America, and, in his autobiography, Heston lamented that “the film I cared more about than any I’ve ever made was a failure.”
Digg
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Del.icio.us
Reddit
YahooAdvertisement
COMMENTS | POST A COMMENT 
- Comment by Jamie Welton on 7/12/08 at 11:40 am
More of a question than a comment. Are there legal issues with regards to copywrite when basing a movie on a play/book that was written 100+ years ago?
Latest from the blog:
I.O.U.S.A Wants You to Take Action
From An Inconvenient Truth (2006) to Sicko (2007), movies are becoming the choice medium for exposing societal problems in an effort to fuel change. Patrick Creadon’s I.O.U.S.A. is another documentary intent on exposing America’s troubles, this time taking a harsh look at our current economic situation and offering suggestions on how to make the nation financially secure for the future. The film is not just a presentation of the facts, however; the minds behind it have decided to take a more proactive role in making sure their movie inspires dialogue among viewers.
Posted 08.19.08 | News/Commentary | No comments yet...
Other recent posts:
Tropic Thunder Knocks Out The Dark Knight
Fuji Wants You!
In Theaters Now: Star Wars: The Clone Wars, Tropic Thunder, Vicky Cristina Barcelona
Posts people are talking about:
SITE DELIVERY OPTIONS
Advertisement
